1984 Zastava 750 vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Megane (112 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1984 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1984 Zastava 750.
Because 1984 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Megane (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Zastava 750. (55 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Zastava 750.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Zastava 750 | 2010 Renault Megane | |
Make | Zastava | Renault |
Model | 750 | Megane |
Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 55 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1470 mm |