1984 Zastava 750 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 281 more horse power than 1984 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1984 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1128 kg more than 1984 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (373 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 318 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Zastava 750. (55 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Zastava 750. 2013 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1984 Zastava 750 has manual transmission. 1984 Zastava 750 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: