1984 ZIL 4104 vs. 2008 Holden Epica
To start off, 2008 Holden Epica is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 ZIL 4104. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 ZIL 4104 would be higher. At 7,695 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 ZIL 4104 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 ZIL 4104 (310 HP) has 157 more horse power than 2008 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1984 ZIL 4104 should accelerate faster than 2008 Holden Epica.
Because 1984 ZIL 4104 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 ZIL 4104. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 ZIL 4104 (609 Nm) has 372 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 1984 ZIL 4104 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 ZIL 4104 | 2008 Holden Epica | |
| Make | ZIL | Holden |
| Model | 4104 | Epica |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7695 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 310 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 609 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5750 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2100 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2700 mm |
