1985 Abarth A 112 vs. 1951 Austin A 40
To start off, 1985 Abarth A 112 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Austin A 40 weights approximately 305 kg more than 1985 Abarth A 112.
Because 1951 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Abarth A 112 | 1951 Austin A 40 | |
| Make | Abarth | Austin |
| Model | A 112 | A 40 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1951 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 49 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 990 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2360 mm |
