1985 Abarth A 112 vs. 2009 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2009 Suzuki Equator is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Suzuki Equator weights approximately 290 kg more than 1985 Abarth A 112.
Because 2009 Suzuki Equator is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Suzuki Equator. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Abarth A 112 | 2009 Suzuki Equator | |
Make | Abarth | Suzuki |
Model | A 112 | Equator |
Year Released | 1985 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 152 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 5250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3200 mm |