1985 AC Cobra vs. 1997 Renault Helem
To start off, 1997 Renault Helem is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1985 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Renault Helem (510 HP) has 287 more horse power than 1985 AC Cobra. (223 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Renault Helem should accelerate faster than 1985 AC Cobra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Renault Helem weights approximately 570 kg more than 1985 AC Cobra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 AC Cobra (407 Nm) has 322 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Renault Helem. (85 Nm). This means 1985 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Renault Helem.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 AC Cobra | 1997 Renault Helem | |
| Make | AC | Renault |
| Model | Cobra | Helem |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4942 cc | 2975 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 510 HP |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1650 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 80 L |
