1985 AC Cobra vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 AC Cobra would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 AC Cobra weights approximately 145 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Because 1985 AC Cobra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 AC Cobra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 AC Cobra | 2000 Renault Clio | |
Make | AC | Renault |
Model | Cobra | Clio |
Year Released | 1985 | 2000 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 50 L |