1985 AC Cobra vs. 2008 Mazda Rustler
To start off, 2008 Mazda Rustler is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1985 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 AC Cobra weights approximately 66 kg more than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Because 1985 AC Cobra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 AC Cobra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Rustler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 AC Cobra (407 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 287 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (120 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1985 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Compare all specifications:
1985 AC Cobra | 2008 Mazda Rustler | |
Make | AC | Mazda |
Model | Cobra | Rustler |
Year Released | 1985 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 1586 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1014 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 54 L |