1985 AC Cobra vs. 2012 Mazda BT-50

To start off, 2012 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1985 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 AC Cobra (223 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2012 Mazda BT-50. (123 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda BT-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 470 kg more than 1985 AC Cobra.

Because 2012 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 AC Cobra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 AC Cobra (407 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mazda BT-50. (206 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1985 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mazda BT-50.

Compare all specifications:

1985 AC Cobra 2012 Mazda BT-50
Make AC Mazda
Model Cobra BT-50
Year Released 1985 2012
Body Type Roadster Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4942 cc 2606 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 223 HP 123 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 407 Nm 206 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1080 kg 1550 kg
Vehicle Height 1210 mm 1810 mm
Wheelbase Size 2300 mm 3010 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 90 L 50 L