1985 Alfa Romeo 33 vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1985 Alfa Romeo 33 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1155 kg more than 1985 Alfa Romeo 33.
Because 1963 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Alfa Romeo 33, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Alfa Romeo 33 | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | 33 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1489 cc | 6388 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 2055 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3300 mm |
