1985 Alfa Romeo Arna vs. 1966 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1985 Alfa Romeo Arna is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,728 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Cougar (129 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1985 Alfa Romeo Arna. (94 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1985 Alfa Romeo Arna. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 442 kg more than 1985 Alfa Romeo Arna. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Alfa Romeo Arna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Alfa Romeo Arna | 1966 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mercury |
Model | Arna | Cougar |
Year Released | 1985 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1490 cc | 4728 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1362 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2830 mm |