1985 Audi 100 vs. 1958 Seat 600
To start off, 1985 Audi 100 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1985 Audi 100 (136 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1958 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 1958 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Audi 100 weights approximately 654 kg more than 1958 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Audi 100 (180 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1985 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Audi 100 | 1958 Seat 600 | |
Make | Audi | Seat |
Model | 100 | 600 |
Year Released | 1985 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 136 HP | 19 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 40 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 576 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2010 mm |