1985 Audi 100 vs. 1964 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1985 Audi 100 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1985 Audi 100. (100 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1985 Audi 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 975 kg more than 1985 Audi 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Audi 100 | 1964 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | 100 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1921 cc | 7027 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 2120 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3300 mm |
