1985 Audi 100 vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1985 Audi 100 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,986 cc (5 cylinders), 1985 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Audi 100 (87 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Audi 100 weights approximately 636 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Audi 100 | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Audi | DAF |
| Model | 100 | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1986 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 666 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 33 L |
