1985 Audi 100 vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1985 Audi 100 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,986 cc (5 cylinders), 1985 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Audi 100 (87 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Audi 100 weights approximately 414 kg more than 1967 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Audi 100 (172 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1985 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Audi 100 | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Audi | Riley |
Model | 100 | Kestrel |
Year Released | 1985 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 1986 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 172 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 888 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 25 L |