1985 Audi 100 vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Audi 100 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Renault Clio (171 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1985 Audi 100. (87 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1985 Audi 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Audi 100 weights approximately 247 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Renault Clio (200 Nm @ 5400 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Audi 100. (172 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2000 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Audi 100 | 2000 Renault Clio | |
Make | Audi | Renault |
Model | 100 | Clio |
Year Released | 1985 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1986 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 172 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2480 mm |