1985 Audi 100 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Audi 100 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1985 Audi 100. (87 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1985 Audi 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Audi 100 weights approximately 2 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Audi 100. (172 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Audi 100 | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | 100 | Tracker |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1986 cc | 2491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 165 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 172 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 75 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 61 L |
