1985 Audi 100 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Audi 100 would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1985 Audi 100. (134 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1985 Audi 100.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Audi 100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Audi 100. (186 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Audi 100 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | 100 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1985 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 2299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 209 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 87.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 94 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2840 mm |