1985 Audi 100 vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Audi 100 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1985 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 12 more horse power than 1985 Audi 100. (136 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1985 Audi 100.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Audi 100. (180 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Audi 100 | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | 100 | Epica |
Year Released | 1985 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 136 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 180 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2700 mm |