1985 Audi 100 vs. 2012 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2012 Nissan Cube is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Audi 100 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (5 cylinders), 1985 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Cube (122 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1985 Audi 100. (87 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Cube should accelerate faster than 1985 Audi 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Audi 100 weights approximately 13 kg more than 2012 Nissan Cube.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 172 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Audi 100 | 2012 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | 100 | Cube |
Year Released | 1985 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1986 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 172 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1289 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1651 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 50 L |