1985 Audi 200 vs. 1942 Cadillac 60
To start off, 1985 Audi 200 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Audi 200 (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 410 kg more than 1985 Audi 200.
Because 1985 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1942 Cadillac 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Audi 200 | 1942 Cadillac 60 | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | 200 | 60 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1942 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 5671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3230 mm |
