1985 Audi 200 vs. 1951 Riley RM A
To start off, 1985 Audi 200 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1985 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Audi 200 weights approximately 55 kg more than 1951 Riley RM A.
Because 1985 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Audi 200 | 1951 Riley RM A | |
Make | Audi | Riley |
Model | 200 | RM A |
Year Released | 1985 | 1951 |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2870 mm |