1985 Audi 200 vs. 1953 Buick 40
To start off, 1985 Audi 200 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,315 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Audi 200 (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1953 Buick 40. (123 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1953 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Buick 40 weights approximately 255 kg more than 1985 Audi 200.
Because 1985 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Buick 40 (304 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Audi 200. (252 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1953 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Audi 200.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Audi 200 | 1953 Buick 40 | |
Make | Audi | Buick |
Model | 200 | 40 |
Year Released | 1985 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 4315 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 304 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 80.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 104.8 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3090 mm |