1985 Audi 200 vs. 1954 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1985 Audi 200 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Audi 200 (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Audi 200 weights approximately 380 kg more than 1954 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Audi 200 (252 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Jeep CJ. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1985 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Audi 200 | 1954 Jeep CJ | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | 200 | CJ |
Year Released | 1985 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2060 mm |