1985 Audi 200 vs. 1963 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1985 Audi 200 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1985 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Audi 200 (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Audi 200 weights approximately 325 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1985 Audi 200 (252 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1985 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Audi 200 | 1963 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | 200 | Cedric |
Year Released | 1985 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2540 mm |