1985 Audi 200 vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1985 Audi 200 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1985 Audi 200. (200 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1985 Audi 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 785 kg more than 1985 Audi 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Audi 200 | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | 200 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 7028 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 208 HP |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 2075 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3300 mm |
