1985 Audi 200 vs. 1964 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1985 Audi 200 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Audi 200 (200 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1964 Sunbeam Tiger. (163 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1964 Sunbeam Tiger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Audi 200 weights approximately 150 kg more than 1964 Sunbeam Tiger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1985 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Sunbeam Tiger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Audi 200 | 1964 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Audi | Sunbeam |
| Model | 200 | Tiger |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 4261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 163 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2190 mm |
