1985 Audi 200 vs. 1965 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1985 Audi 200 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1985 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Audi 200 (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Audi 200 weights approximately 510 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Audi 200 | 1965 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | 200 | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1189 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2290 mm |
