1985 Audi 200 vs. 1967 Jaguar 240
To start off, 1985 Audi 200 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Jaguar 240 (208 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1985 Audi 200. (200 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Jaguar 240 should accelerate faster than 1985 Audi 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 230 kg more than 1985 Audi 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Jaguar 240 (300 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Audi 200. (258 Nm). This means 1967 Jaguar 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Audi 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Audi 200 | 1967 Jaguar 240 | |
| Make | Audi | Jaguar |
| Model | 200 | 240 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 3442 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 208 HP |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 8.1:1 |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1520 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2740 mm |
