1985 Audi 200 vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1985 Audi 200 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1985 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Audi 200 (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1968 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1968 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Audi 200 weights approximately 980 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1985 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Audi 200 | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Audi | Lotus |
Model | 200 | Elan |
Year Released | 1985 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 45 L |