1985 Audi 200 vs. 1968 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1985 Audi 200 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1985 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Audi 200 (200 HP) has 138 more horse power than 1968 Nissan Bluebird. (62 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1968 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Audi 200 weights approximately 385 kg more than 1968 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1985 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Nissan Bluebird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Audi 200 (258 Nm) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Nissan Bluebird. (103 Nm). This means 1985 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Audi 200 | 1968 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | 200 | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1985 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 62 HP |
Torque | 258 Nm | 103 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2430 mm |