1985 Audi 200 vs. 1968 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1985 Audi 200 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1985 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Audi 200 (200 HP) has 162 more horse power than 1968 ZAZ 966. (38 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1968 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Audi 200 weights approximately 516 kg more than 1968 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1985 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 ZAZ 966. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Audi 200 (258 Nm) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 ZAZ 966. (72 Nm). This means 1985 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Audi 200 | 1968 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Audi | ZAZ |
| Model | 200 | 966 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 38 HP |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 72 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 774 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2170 mm |
