1985 Audi 200 vs. 1969 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 1985 Audi 200 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 7,732 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Eldorado (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1985 Audi 200. (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1985 Audi 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 660 kg more than 1985 Audi 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1985 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Cadillac Eldorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Cadillac Eldorado (710 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 458 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Audi 200. (252 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1969 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Audi 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Audi 200 | 1969 Cadillac Eldorado | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | 200 | Eldorado |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 7732 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 228 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 252 Nm | 710 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 109.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 103.1 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 2070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 79 L |
