1985 Audi 200 vs. 1970 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 1985 Audi 200 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 740 kg more than 1985 Audi 200.
Because 1985 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Audi 200 | 1970 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Audi | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | 200 | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
| Top Speed | 230 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 2150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 107 L |
