1985 Audi 200 vs. 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne
To start off, 1985 Audi 200 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Audi 200 (200 HP) has 90 more horse power than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne.
Because 1985 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Audi 200 (258 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. (251 Nm). This means 1985 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Audi 200 | 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | 200 | Biscayne |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 4097 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 110 HP |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3090 mm |
