1985 Audi 200 vs. 1980 Renault 12
To start off, 1985 Audi 200 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Renault 12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Renault 12 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1985 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Audi 200 (200 HP) has 147 more horse power than 1980 Renault 12. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1980 Renault 12. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Audi 200 weights approximately 336 kg more than 1980 Renault 12. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1985 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Renault 12. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Audi 200 (258 Nm) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Renault 12. (96 Nm). This means 1985 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Renault 12.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Audi 200 | 1980 Renault 12 | |
| Make | Audi | Renault |
| Model | 200 | 12 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 96 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 954 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2450 mm |
