1985 Audi 200 vs. 1992 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 1992 Ford Aerostar is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,977 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Audi 200 (200 HP) has 57 more horse power than 1992 Ford Aerostar. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 120 kg more than 1985 Audi 200.
Because 1985 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Ford Aerostar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Audi 200 (258 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Aerostar. (224 Nm). This means 1985 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Aerostar.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Audi 200 | 1992 Ford Aerostar | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | 200 | Aerostar |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2977 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 143 HP |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 224 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 78.7 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1410 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3030 mm |
