1985 Audi 200 vs. 1995 Chevrolet Tracker

To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1985 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Audi 200 (200 HP) has 103 more horse power than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Audi 200 weights approximately 60 kg more than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Audi 200 (258 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 1985 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker.

Compare all specifications:

1985 Audi 200 1995 Chevrolet Tracker
Make Audi Chevrolet
Model 200 Tracker
Year Released 1985 1995
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2144 cc 1589 cc
Engine Cylinders 5 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 200 HP 97 HP
Torque 258 Nm 139 Nm
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1290 kg 1230 kg
Vehicle Length 4810 mm 3860 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1700 mm
Wheelbase Size 2690 mm 2210 mm