1985 Audi 200 vs. 1996 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 1996 Ford Aerostar is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Audi 200 (200 HP) has 67 more horse power than 1996 Ford Aerostar. (133 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 225 kg more than 1985 Audi 200.
Because 1985 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Ford Aerostar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Audi 200 (258 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Ford Aerostar. (217 Nm). This means 1985 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Ford Aerostar.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Audi 200 | 1996 Ford Aerostar | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | 200 | Aerostar |
Year Released | 1985 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 133 HP |
Torque | 258 Nm | 217 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3030 mm |