1985 Audi 200 vs. 1997 Suzuki C2
To start off, 1997 Suzuki C2 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1985 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Suzuki C2 (251 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1985 Audi 200. (200 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Suzuki C2 should accelerate faster than 1985 Audi 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Audi 200 weights approximately 442 kg more than 1997 Suzuki C2.
Because 1985 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Suzuki C2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Suzuki C2 (284 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Audi 200. (258 Nm). This means 1997 Suzuki C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Audi 200.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Audi 200 | 1997 Suzuki C2 | |
Make | Audi | Suzuki |
Model | 200 | C2 |
Year Released | 1985 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 251 HP |
Torque | 258 Nm | 284 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 848 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2240 mm |