1985 Audi 200 vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Audi 200 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1985 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden HRT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 563 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Audi 200. (252 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Audi 200.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Audi 200 | 2000 Holden HRT | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | 200 | HRT |
Year Released | 1985 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 252 Nm | 815 Nm |
Top Speed | 230 km/hour | 300 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |