1985 Audi 200 vs. 2001 Cadillac Catera
To start off, 2001 Cadillac Catera is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,962 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Cadillac Catera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 200 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Cadillac Catera weights approximately 415 kg more than 1985 Audi 200.
Because 1985 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Cadillac Catera. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Cadillac Catera (260 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Audi 200. (258 Nm). This means 2001 Cadillac Catera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Audi 200. 2001 Cadillac Catera has automatic transmission and 1985 Audi 200 has manual transmission. 1985 Audi 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Cadillac Catera will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Audi 200 | 2001 Cadillac Catera | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | 200 | Catera |
Year Released | 1985 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2962 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 258 Nm | 260 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2940 mm |