1985 Audi 200 vs. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1985 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Audi 200 (200 HP) has 103 more horse power than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 1985 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Audi 200 (258 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 1985 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Audi 200 | 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | 200 | Tracker |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 97 HP |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 139 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2210 mm |
