1985 Audi 200 vs. 2001 Ford Econovan
To start off, 2001 Ford Econovan is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1985 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Audi 200 (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2001 Ford Econovan. (96 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econovan weights approximately 35 kg more than 1985 Audi 200.
Because 1985 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Ford Econovan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Audi 200 (252 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Econovan. (155 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1985 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Econovan.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Audi 200 | 2001 Ford Econovan | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | 200 | Econovan |
Year Released | 1985 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1445 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2210 mm |