1985 Audi 200 vs. 2001 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2001 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Audi 200 (200 HP) has 88 more horse power than 2001 Nissan X-Trail. (112 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 310 kg more than 1985 Audi 200.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan X-Trail (270 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Audi 200. (258 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Audi 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Audi 200 | 2001 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | 200 | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2184 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 112 HP |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 16.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 230 km/hour | 165 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1600 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2540 mm |
