1985 Audi 200 vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2003 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Audi 200 (200 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. (177 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 2003 Nissan X-Trail.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Audi 200 (258 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. (245 Nm). This means 1985 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Audi 200 | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | 200 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1985 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 177 HP |
Torque | 258 Nm | 245 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1290 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2810 mm |