1985 Audi 200 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Audi 200 (200 HP) has 35 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (165 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 10 kg more than 1985 Audi 200.
Let's talk about torque, 1985 Audi 200 (258 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 1985 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Audi 200 | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | 200 | Tracker |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 165 HP |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 75 mm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2490 mm |
