1985 Audi 200 vs. 2004 Chrysler Crossfire
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Audi 200 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire (210 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1985 Audi 200. (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1985 Audi 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 53 kg more than 1985 Audi 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1985 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Chrysler Crossfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Audi 200. (252 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2004 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Audi 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Audi 200 | 2004 Chrysler Crossfire | |
| Make | Audi | Chrysler |
| Model | 200 | Crossfire |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 3199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 252 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 89.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1463 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 60 L |
