1985 Audi 200 vs. 2004 GMC Canyon
To start off, 2004 GMC Canyon is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Audi 200 (180 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2004 GMC Canyon. (175 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Canyon weights approximately 245 kg more than 1985 Audi 200.
Because 2004 GMC Canyon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Audi 200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 GMC Canyon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Audi 200 (252 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 GMC Canyon. (251 Nm). This means 1985 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Audi 200 | 2004 GMC Canyon | |
Make | Audi | GMC |
Model | 200 | Canyon |
Year Released | 1985 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2142 cc | 2770 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 175 HP |
Torque | 252 Nm | 251 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1725 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 74 L |