1985 Audi 200 vs. 2005 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1985 Audi 200. (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1985 Audi 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 112 kg more than 1985 Audi 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac CTS (264 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Audi 200. (252 Nm). This means 2005 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Audi 200.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Audi 200 | 2005 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | 200 | CTS |
Year Released | 1985 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2142 cc | 2786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 264 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1592 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 64 L |